Home / Solutions / Professional services

Industry

Procurement Compliance Software for Professional Services
Engagements end. The record has to stay

Professional services firms buy expertise rather than goods, which makes the purchasing file harder rather than easier. There is no delivery note, so the evidence is the scope, the rate and the reasoning behind choosing that particular supplier.

Scope attached at engagementRates checked against the agreement
The defining pressure

Buying expertise leaves less to point at

When you buy equipment there is a delivery note. When you buy three weeks of a specialist's time there is a scope document, a rate and a decision, and if none of those were captured properly the file has very little in it.

ProcureAudit Scope disputes become short
Outcome 01

Scope disputes become short

A written scope attached to the engagement is what turns a disagreement about what was included into a two minute conversation.

What that meansFewer disputed invoices and considerably shorter final account discussions.
ProcureAudit Rates are agreed rather than argued
Outcome 02

Rates are agreed rather than argued

Confirming the rate against the agreement at engagement rather than accepting it from an invoice removes the most common professional services dispute.

What that meansInvoices arrive at the rate you expected, because it was checked upfront.
ProcureAudit Extra work stays visible
Outcome 03

Extra work stays visible

Additional scope agreed mid engagement has a habit of disappearing into the original award. Recording it as a modification keeps the money and the approval attached to the change.

What that meansVariation value that can be recovered rather than absorbed silently.
Traditional handling against this approach

Where services purchasing loses its record

None of these failures are unique to professional services, but they all hurt more when there is no physical delivery to point at.

Book a demo
ProcureAudit Agreed in conversation
The challenge

Agreed in conversation

The subcontractor and the engagement lead both understood what was included, and neither of them wrote it down in a document attached to the award.

Written scopeNo
DisputesLong
EvidenceA recollection
ProcureAudit Attached to the engagement
With ProcureAudit

Attached to the engagement

A written scope sits on the award, so what was included is a document rather than two differing memories.

Written scopeYes
DisputesShort
EvidenceThe document
ProcureAudit Taken from the invoice
The challenge

Taken from the invoice

The rate is discovered when the first invoice arrives, and challenging it at that point is awkward because the work has already been done.

ConfirmedAt invoice
ChallengeableAwkwardly
SourceThe supplier
ProcureAudit Checked at engagement
With ProcureAudit

Checked at engagement

The rate is confirmed against the agreement before the work starts, so the invoice matches what was expected.

ConfirmedAt engagement
ChallengeableNot needed
SourceThe agreement
ProcureAudit Absorbed into the original
The challenge

Absorbed into the original

Extra scope gets done because it was reasonable, and by final account nobody can separate it from what was originally agreed.

RecordedNo
RecoverableRarely
ArguedAt final account
ProcureAudit Recorded as modifications
With ProcureAudit

Recorded as modifications

Each variation carries its own value, approval and evidence, so it stays separable from the original engagement.

RecordedYes
RecoverableYes
ArguedNot usually
ProcureAudit The team has moved on
The challenge

The team has moved on

Professional services teams rotate quickly, and the engagement lead who made the decision is usually elsewhere when somebody asks about it.

ReasoningWith them
RetrievableNo
AnswerAn estimate
ProcureAudit Written at the decision
With ProcureAudit

Written at the decision

Reasoning is captured when the subcontractor is chosen, so it survives the rotation entirely.

ReasoningOn the record
RetrievableYes
AnswerDirect
What the file contains

Six things worth capturing on a services engagement

Professional services • Walkthrough

Six things worth capturing on a services engagement

What was included, attached to the award rather than agreed verbally.

  • The written scope
  • The agreed rate
  • Why this subcontractor
ProcureAudit The written scope
01

The written scope

What was included, attached to the award rather than agreed verbally.

ProcureAudit The agreed rate
02

The agreed rate

Confirmed against the agreement before work starts, not read off an invoice.

ProcureAudit Why this subcontractor
03

Why this subcontractor

Written at the decision, since there is no delivery record to fall back on.

ProcureAudit Who approved it
04

Who approved it

By name, with the date and the value at that point.

ProcureAudit Each variation
05

Each variation

Recorded as a modification with its own value and approval.

ProcureAudit The activity trail
06

The activity trail

Who did what and when, which matters more when there is nothing physical to inspect.

On an engagement

What decides the final account

Professional services • Walkthrough

What decides the final account

Scope, rate and reasoning captured before the work starts rather than reconstructed from an invoice.

  • Engaging specialist expertise
  • Extra scope agreed mid engagement
  • An invoice is disputed
ProcureAudit Engaging specialist expertise
01

Engaging specialist expertise

Scope, rate and reasoning captured before the work starts rather than reconstructed from an invoice.

Learn more
ProcureAudit Extra scope agreed mid engagement
02

Extra scope agreed mid engagement

Recorded as a modification with its own value so it stays recoverable at final account.

Learn more
ProcureAudit An invoice is disputed
03

An invoice is disputed

Settled against the agreed rate and the written scope rather than two differing recollections.

Learn more
FAQ

Questions from professional services firms

We buy expertise, not goods. Does this still fit?
Yes, and arguably more so. Without a delivery note the file rests entirely on the scope, the rate and the reasoning, which are exactly the three things this captures at the point of engagement.
How are variations handled?
As modifications with their own value, approval and evidence, so extra scope stays separable from the original engagement rather than being absorbed into it.
Can we check rates against a rate card?
Yes. The rate is confirmed against the agreement at engagement rather than accepted from an invoice, which removes the most common dispute in services purchasing.
What happens when the engagement lead moves on?
Nothing to the record. The reasoning for choosing that subcontractor was written when the decision was made rather than held in their memory.
Do we need a scope document for every engagement?
We would recommend it. A written scope attached to the award is what turns a disagreement about inclusions into a short conversation rather than a long one.
Can one engagement serve two clients or awards?
Yes, split at the request with the basis recorded, rather than apportioned later by estimate.
How long does the record stay readable?
As long as you need. Because it is built as the engagement runs rather than assembled at closeout, old engagements read the same way recent ones do.
More solutions

Other sectors and roles worth reading

ProcureAudit IT and cybersecurity
SOLUTION

IT and cybersecurity

Purchasing where the supply chain behind an award is examined too.

Learn more
ProcureAudit Small business and 8(a)
SOLUTION

Small business and 8(a)

The same documentation expectations carried by far fewer people.

Learn more
ProcureAudit Contracts managers
SOLUTION

Contracts managers

The person who has to produce the file, usually at short notice.

Learn more

Bring an engagement that was disputed

Ideally one where scope or rate came up at final account. We will show what the record would have contained.

Book a demo